<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Netvouz / PROJECTCONSULT / tag / rm</title>
<link>http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT/tag/rm?feed=rss&amp;pg=5</link>
<description>PROJECTCONSULT&#39;s bookmarks tagged &quot;rm&quot; on Netvouz</description>
<item><title>[EN] Marc Fresko - DLM Forum: A tightrope Balance Act - MoReq2010</title>
<link>http://www.project-consult.net/files/MoReq2010_Marc_Fresco_A_tightrope_Balancing_Act.pdf</link>
<description>Marc Fresko - DLM Forum: A tightrope Balance Act - MoReq2010 - Developing something like MoReq2010 is a bit like crossing a chasm by tightrope – a circus high-wire. If you succeed in crossing the rope, you reach the end and everyone applauds. If you fall off – you fail – then you can be injured, perhaps fatally. And if you don’t know what you are doing, you can ‘freeze’ in the middle, unable to advance
or go back – then everyone laughs at you, stuck in the middle of an unfinished act.</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:27:37 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq 2010 - a new world standard for compliance &amp; best practice</title>
<link>http://www.moreq2.eu/other/moreq2010-anouncements/files-download/236_391dfc27e1bdbe0d9b8b3806bf7f16c9</link>
<description>[EN] MoReq 2010 - a new world standard for compliance &amp; best practice information management for all sectors | Records Society Bulletin 157</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:53:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq 2010 | Public Consultation Portal</title>
<link>http://contribute2moreq.eu/</link>
<description>The public consultation portal for the redesign of the MoReq Records Management standard</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 08:45:37 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq Model Requirements for the Management of Electronic Records | Homepage</title>
<link>http://www.moreq.info/</link>
<description>MoReq and MoReq2 website launched on 9.9.2009. The page is maintained by the MGB MoReq Governance Board of the DLM Forum (www.DLM-Forum.eu).</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:46:32 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq2 product certificate for Fabasoft &quot;Folio&quot; | 31.07.2009</title>
<link>http://www.project-consult.net/files/MoReq2_Product_Certificate_Fabasoft_V1.0.pdf</link>
<description>The product &quot;Folio&quot; version 9.0.3 passed the tests successfully in June and July 2009. The certificate was issued July 31st, 2009, by the accredited MoReq2 testcenter imbus AG (http://www.imbus.de) on behalf of the DLM Forum, The certificate covers all core modules with reference to the MoReq2 requirement chapters 3 to 9 as well several optional modules from MoReq2 requirements chapter 10: Management of physic (non-electronic) records, disposition of physical records, Document Management and Collaborative Working, Workflow, Casework, and Distributed systems.</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 06:53:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq2010 – Records Management Rant | SAPERION Blog | Volker John | 15.07.2010</title>
<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/de/moreq2010-records-management-rant/2187/</link>
<description>Comments about the future of MoReq2010 ... I was devastated though, to be part of the DLM Forum’s spring meeting this year. Not only did I see my concerns about the future of MoReq2 confirmed, but I had to learn that now we have another bunch of people who are working to make MoReq2010 the RM standard that could (or would, or should? Whatever.). Now, this in itself is not news anymore, as others have brokered information like this to the general public much sooner.</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:44:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq2010 | new developments | 14.03.2010</title>
<link>http://www.bit.ly/ctIygM</link>
<description>MoReq2010 | new developments | press release | DLM Forum | 14.03.2010 | MGB MoReq Governance Board</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:05:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq2010 a DOD 5015 Slayer? | Real Story Group - MoReq2010 is not yet released ;-)</title>
<link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2162-Moreq2010-a-DOD5015-slayer</link>
<description>Moreq2010 a DOD5015 slayer? #ecm #standards - Real Story Group - Alan Pelz-Sharpe - 23.05.2011 - As subscribers to our research know only too well, standards in the world of document and records management are a bit thin on the ground, and those that do exist are often cumbersome and unwieldy.  As a result, few buyers of document and record management systems (ECM) pay much attention to them. This is particularly the case in the world of Records Management, where the US Military DOD5015 standard has long held sway -- at least in theory. Vendors claim DOD5015 compliance, but in reality few organizations actually use the systems in a DOD5015-compliant manner. It&#39;s an over-arching standard that demands a particularly complex and cumbersome working methodolo...</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 10:57:08 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] OVUM: Microsoft needs to buy an ISO 15489-compliant RM product | www.bharatbook.com | 12.12.2009</title>
<link>http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2009/12/12/4528905.htm</link>
<description>OVUM: Microsoft needs to buy an ISO 15489-compliant RM product | www.bharatbook.com | 12.12.2009 | To retain credibility for its enterprise content management offering to regulated industries and government, Microsoft needs to acquire electronic document and records management (EDRM/RM) technology that has been certified to the ISO 15489 standard. Our research reports span the global software and IT services domain covering: strategic issues, technology and services, companies and markets.</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] Records management futurewatch | Steve Bailey</title>
<link>http://rmfuturewatch.blogspot.com/</link>
<description>Blog von Steve Bailey zu Records Management und Schriftgutverwaltung</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:48:52 GMT</pubDate>
</item></channel></rss>