<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Netvouz / PROJECTCONSULT / tag / standards</title>
<link>http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT/tag/standards?feed=rss&amp;pg=14</link>
<description>PROJECTCONSULT&#39;s bookmarks tagged &quot;standards&quot; on Netvouz</description>
<item><title>[EN] MoReq2010 - Comments and discussions update June/July 2011 | XING</title>
<link>https://www.xing.com/net/pri5a40e0x/informationlifecyclemanagement/records-management-2657/en-discussion-about-moreq2010-update-june-july-37439012/</link>
<description>MoReq2010 - Comments and discussions update June/July 2011 | XING | Although the launch of MoReq2010 happened rather unnoticed, the discussion about the new European records management standard by the DLM Forum started - on Twitter, in the MoReq2010 forum, and in several blogs. Mainly vendors and consultants are contributing to this discussion. Only a few records management users and representatives of records management organisations or archives contributed so far. There is no sign of discussion from the academic realm. Contributions mainly come from US, England, Netherlands, Russia, and Germany. We also had some contributions here on XING: [EN] http://bit.ly/qKDmJI , http://bit.ly/ou49bB , http://bit.ly/qCyutn and [DE] http://bit.ly/oLyb0Q.</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 16:53:26 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq2010 - or MoReq2011 - Marc Fresko asks about the release plan</title>
<link>http://aiimcommunities.com/erm/blog/moreq2010-or-moreq2011</link>
<description>MoReq2010 is late - and there is no substantial information available in the market</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 19:12:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq2010 – Records Management Rant | SAPERION Blog | Volker John | 15.07.2010</title>
<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/de/moreq2010-records-management-rant/2187/</link>
<description>Comments about the future of MoReq2010 ... I was devastated though, to be part of the DLM Forum’s spring meeting this year. Not only did I see my concerns about the future of MoReq2 confirmed, but I had to learn that now we have another bunch of people who are working to make MoReq2010 the RM standard that could (or would, or should? Whatever.). Now, this in itself is not news anymore, as others have brokered information like this to the general public much sooner.</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:44:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq2010 | Call for Public Consultation | June 2010</title>
<link>http://www.project-consult.net/files/MoReq_2010_Public_Consultation_v2.pdf</link>
<description>The first MoReq2010 consultation period of four weeks, styled the “concept
collaboration stage” of the programme, will begin in two to three weeks time. If you
would like notification of the launch date please email the DLM Forum secretariat at
secretariat@dlmforum.eu stating “Alert MoReq2010 Public Consultation 1”.</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 11:06:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq2010 | DLM Forum | revised press release 8.6.2011</title>
<link>http://www.dlmforum.eu/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=124:june-8-2011-press-release&amp;catid=18:news&amp;Itemid=48&amp;lang=en</link>
<description>Revised press release from the DLM Forum homepage, June 8th, 2011</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:43:02 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq2010 | new developments | 14.03.2010</title>
<link>http://www.bit.ly/ctIygM</link>
<description>MoReq2010 | new developments | press release | DLM Forum | 14.03.2010 | MGB MoReq Governance Board</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:05:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq2010 2nd draft consultation phase has ended - how to continue?</title>
<link>http://records-management.niniel.org/2007/08/02/moreq-standard/#comment-7989</link>
<description>MoReq2010: Sunday night the 2nd consultation phase for the new version of MoReq was closed | There last days and especially at christmas there were a lot of last minute comments on the consultation portal for MoReq2010. A lot of them not only included critique or error reports but good new ideas, comments and additional functionality. But some of those interested in Records Management and MoReq especially have the feeling, that the current status of MoReq2010 can not be final but a draft only. And this draft has to be discussed in more detail. The reason is, MoReq2010 is very different from MoReq(1) and MoReq2. It is more modern and in regard to the possebilities of electronic systems than the previous MoReq versions.</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:01:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq2010 a DOD 5015 Slayer? | Real Story Group - MoReq2010 is not yet released ;-)</title>
<link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2162-Moreq2010-a-DOD5015-slayer</link>
<description>Moreq2010 a DOD5015 slayer? #ecm #standards - Real Story Group - Alan Pelz-Sharpe - 23.05.2011 - As subscribers to our research know only too well, standards in the world of document and records management are a bit thin on the ground, and those that do exist are often cumbersome and unwieldy.  As a result, few buyers of document and record management systems (ECM) pay much attention to them. This is particularly the case in the world of Records Management, where the US Military DOD5015 standard has long held sway -- at least in theory. Vendors claim DOD5015 compliance, but in reality few organizations actually use the systems in a DOD5015-compliant manner. It&#39;s an over-arching standard that demands a particularly complex and cumbersome working methodolo...</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 10:57:08 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq2010 Accredition, Certification &amp; Test Documents | Download</title>
<link>http://www.dlmforum.eu/index.php?option=com_jotloader&amp;view=categories&amp;cid=42_114d22273d1dffa39825dde3faedd569&amp;Itemid=139&amp;lang=en</link>
<description>MoReq2010 Certification &amp; Test Documents | Download | MoReq2010 Accreditation, Certification &amp; Testing | Documentation relating to the formal accreditation of test centres and the testing and certification of products and site installations under MoReq2010. | About the BETA test programme | 
The MoReq2010 test framework is currently in BETA until the test materials can be verified in the field by testing against actual solutions. Until the test programme comes out of BETA updates of the test framework will be posted here from time to time. Remember to check back.</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:35:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item><item><title>[EN] MoReq2010 And The New RM Debate | Jens Huebel</title>
<link>http://blogs.opentext.com/vca/blog/1.11.623/article/1.26.933/2011/7/7</link>
<description>MoReq2010 And The New RM Debate | Jens Huebel | A first look into the recently published MoReq2010 specification. What&#39;s new and what is different to other standards?
| Recently a new version of the MoReq specification (MoReq2010) has been published by the DLM forum. MoReq2010 is different in many aspects from other standards in the records management area including previous versions of MoReq itself. This has led to an interesting debate about a new era in records management.</description>
<category domain="http://www.netvouz.com/PROJECTCONSULT?category=5690620393313393337"></category>
<author>PROJECTCONSULT</author>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 07:30:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item></channel></rss>